Connect with us

Cryptocurrency News

Europe vs. US: Crypto regulation differs because of political system



The difference on crypto attitude lie in political systems themselves.

The relationship between the cryptocurrencies and the federal government is complicated one. The SEC and its sister branches were always cautious enough to not be too hasty with the regulatory crack down on the nascent market. But they also were not very happy about it.

The crackdowns did came from NASAA which is the securities regulatory body for the entire North America. It cooperates at various level of government to track and punish frauds in financial markets.

One of the oldest bodies in international finance, it went after almost sixty fraudulent cases and emerged very successful in suppressing some really bad actors. But the media spin put the entire operation a crackdown on crypto market itself. This was something which was not right.

The relationship of American government with the market is scattered and ambiguous to say the least. The state enjoys enormous rights under the US constitution to forge their path and this unique decentralization of power favors crypto in US.

Unlike Europe where supranational bureaucracy of Brussels is omnipotent and can impose its will on the populace without being subject to democratic pressures. Why bother the crowds when you can get thing done. The EU’s response against Estcoin where the Estonian desires to launch a national cryptocurrency pegged to Euro was crushed brutally without much repercussions.

American Exceptionalism according to Martin Lipset is rooted in this unique experiment where the founding fathers of the United States detested the centralizing tendencies of the state. The Federalist Papers co-written by three of them clearly points to this case. The essence of American Revolution lies not in centralization of power but the devolution of power. This devolution fundamentally strengthen checks and balances of Montesquieu.

The Bill 86 of the North Carolina demonstrate the American case. The states are coming up with the ways to determine how to regulate the crypto market. These regulations are according to their own needs. The Bill seems to satisfy the needs of crypto community and is quite reasonable. It puts more emphasis on permissible investments and statutory trusts.

Any firm involved with crypto has to be certified and report their crypto related activities. The commissioner Ray Grace is granted the power to provide the license. The bill reads, “If the license possesses virtual currency as permissible investments under this Article, the Commissioner may at any time request that the licensee verify, in a manner acceptable to the Commissioner, aggregate virtual currency transmission obligations outstanding and virtual currency held as permissible investments, including virtual currency stored offline.”

The Coinbase was the first one to respond to the bill and complimented Commissioner Grace for his special efforts. Commissioner Grace went in depth on the implications of the virtual currencies and came out with the bill.

This proves that the American decentralized political system can come up with the ways which allows judicious regulation of the crypto arena. Wyoming is also preparing legislations on similar lines.

Contrast these with European examples. The Brussels cabal will never agree for an innovative way of its constituent member to go for innovative efforts. And these are sovereign nation states we are talking about. The American states have much more autonomy when it comes to crypto innovations than the nation-states of Europe.

This is telling why European technology firms always follow the US. Decentralization can be future but the very existence of European project is anti-thesis to this idea. United States was born out of the decentralization which is why it is more entrepreneurial, innovative and successful.

Disclaimer: Koinalert’s content is only for information purpose in nature and should not be considered as investment advice. Do your own market research before investing in any cryptocurrencies. The author or publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.

Shubham Dwivedi is an ardent crypto enthusiast, gamer, fanatic binge watcher, and researcher. He writes frequently on the blockchain, crypto market, and ICOs. Self-proclaimed Libertarian and fan of Milton Freidman, his interests lie in the intersection of technology, economics, and politics. DC Fan but also loves Marvel, Manga Otaku, promiscuous reader and habitual cinephile.